But wait fans here is the latest shot fired back by the insurance company... our wonderful representatives who wrote this bill (I don't want to say that they read it since it was sooooo big) left an old fashion loophole that the insurance lawyers are pointing out...

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/29/health/policy/29health.html

Insurers agree that if they provide insurance for a child, they must cover pre-existing conditions. But, they say, the law does not require them to write insurance for the child and it does not guarantee the “availability of coverage” for all until 2014.

Who here is really surprised... if you are going to force something... at least make sure it is written right...

There are LOTS of holes we can see easily...
the major one is that it wont take affect until 2014..2 years AFTER obama leaves office??

"if they provide insurance for a child"
do I have to mention the IF' in this statement?
It will require the Ins corps to do a FULL HEALTH requirement, maybe even DNA sampling..ONCE that hits the childs records...NO ONE will give them coverage.